Standard Performance¶
Single asset, averaged across 4 option sets. Ratios show how many times slower the competitor is relative to Rust — higher means Rust wins by more.
| Language | Compared against | Highlight | Full results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rust | C Tulip, TA-Lib, RustTa, Kand | Beats C Tulip on 64/69 indicators (93%), TA-Lib on 35/37 (95%), RustTa on 18/18, Kand on 35/35 | Standard Performance: Rust → |
| Python | ta, pandas_ta |
Beats ta on 35/35 compared indicators (median ~27×); beats pandas_ta on 72/72 (median ~42×) |
Standard Performance: Python → |
| Node | technicalindicators, indicatorts |
Median speedup 56.71× vs technicalindicators, 6.62× vs indicatorts | Standard Performance: Node → |
| C | Tulip Indicators (C), TA-Lib | Beats C Tulip on 45/72 compared indicators (median 1.73×) | Standard Performance: C → |
| Go | cinar/indicator |
Beats cinar on 45/45 compared indicators (median 2,283×) | Standard Performance: Go → |